Quote Atlassourced quotes & context
3 quotations

Thomas Hobbes Quotes: Sources, Meanings & Themes

Browse quotations by Thomas Hobbes with named works, context notes, meanings and recurring themes.

Source identified1
All society therefore is either for gain, or for glory;
Image design Linen

“All society therefore is either for gain, or for glory;”

Hobbes provocatively explains association through self-interest and reputation, setting up his argument about fear, power and the political conditions needed for lasting society.

Source details

Thomas Hobbes, De Cive, Chapter I, represented in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, Project Gutenberg #73906. 'All society therefore is either for gain, or for glory' appears inside Hobbes's seventeenth-century argument from appetite, glory and self-interest; it is political anthropology/philosophy, not a modern empirical law of all relationships.

Source identified2
The end of knowledge is power;
Image design Botanical Sage

“The end of knowledge is power;”

Hobbes defines philosophical inquiry by practical use: knowledge of causes matters because it enables people to produce effects and accomplish things.

Source details

Thomas Hobbes, De Corpore / Elements of Philosophy, Part I, Chapter I, section 6, represented in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, Project Gutenberg #73877. 'The end of knowledge is power' is immediately developed through the use of theorems for construction and action; it remains Hobbes's seventeenth-century account of philosophy's utility.

Source identified3
and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.
Image design Linen

“and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”

Hobbes describes the insecurity he believes follows where there is no common authority capable of restraining conflict and enforcing peace.

Source details

Leviathan, Part I, Chapter XIII, Project Gutenberg #3207. “And the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” closes Hobbes’s list of consequences in the hypothetical condition where there is no common power able to keep people in awe. It remains a seventeenth-century political-philosophy argument about the state of nature, not a blanket empirical description of ordinary social life.