Quote Atlassourced quotes & context
Named source · 1889

Appreciations, with an Essay on Style Quotes by Walter Pater: Context & Meanings

4 quotations linked to Appreciations, with an Essay on Style by or associated with Walter Pater, with source notes, explanations and related topics.

About this source

1889 collection of literary criticism and the essay “Style”

Topics and ideas

Literary form, structure, differentiation, concentration, Wordsworth, reading, aesthetic training and disciplined critical attention.

Read the source

Open a public or archival text connected with these quotations

Use these links when you want to inspect the wording in its wider work or edition.

Represented passages

4 quotations with source context and meaning

Source identified1
in literary as in all other art, structure is all-important

“in literary as in all other art, structure is all-important”

Pater treats structure as a governing discipline: a work should be conceived as a whole whose parts remain related to its beginning, direction and intended end.

Source details

Appreciations, with an Essay on Style, essay “Style,” printed page 21 in the Macmillan 1910 Library Edition pagination reproduced by Project Gutenberg #4037. “in literary as in all other art, structure is all-important” introduces Pater’s architectural account of composition, where a work’s end is foreseen in its beginning and each part remains conscious of the rest.

Source identified2
makes the reading of Wordsworth an excellent sort of training towards the things of art and poetry.

“makes the reading of Wordsworth an excellent sort of training towards the things of art and poetry.”

Pater presents sustained engagement with a difficult poet as a form of aesthetic training, implying that taste and discrimination can be developed through repeated attentive reading.

Source details

Appreciations, with an Essay on Style, essay “Wordsworth,” printed page 41 in the Macmillan 1910 Library Edition pagination reproduced by Project Gutenberg #4037. Pater says that the contrast between Wordsworth’s higher and lower poetic moods “makes the reading of Wordsworth an excellent sort of training towards the things of art and poetry.” This remains Pater’s critical judgment about aesthetic training, not an experimentally established educational outcome.

Source identified3
a habit of reading between the lines, a faith in the effect of concentration and collectedness of mind in the right appreciation of poetry

“a habit of reading between the lines, a faith in the effect of concentration and collectedness of mind in the right appreciation of poetry”

Pater describes demanding reading as training in concentration and inference, where appreciation grows through disciplined attention instead of quick surface consumption.

Source details

Appreciations, with an Essay on Style, essay “Wordsworth,” printed page 42 in the Macmillan 1910 Library Edition pagination reproduced by Project Gutenberg #4037. The reading-between-the-lines passage follows Pater’s claim that Wordsworth-reading can train aesthetic discrimination; he attributes to receptive readers a habit of inference plus faith in concentration and collectedness of mind. This remains nineteenth-century literary criticism rather than cognitive-science evidence.

Source identified4
all progress of mind consists for the most part in differentiation, in the resolution of an obscure and complex object into its component aspects

“all progress of mind consists for the most part in differentiation, in the resolution of an obscure and complex object into its component aspects”

Pater describes intellectual progress as learning to distinguish parts within what initially seems confused, a method that makes clearer categories and more exact judgment possible.

Source details

Appreciations, with an Essay on Style, essay “Style,” printed page 5 in the standard Macmillan 1910 Library Edition pagination reproduced by Project Gutenberg #4037. “all progress of mind consists for the most part in differentiation...” opens Pater’s argument by distinguishing prose, verse and poetry. This is literary-aesthetic criticism, not a modern experimental claim about cognition or learning.