Quote Atlassourced quotes & context
Named source · 1677

On the Improvement of the Understanding Quotes by Benedict de Spinoza: Context & Meanings

1 quotation linked to On the Improvement of the Understanding by or associated with Benedict de Spinoza, with source notes, explanations and related topics.

About this source

Spinoza’s unfinished Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect, published posthumously in 1677

Topics and ideas

Method, truth, reason, good and evil, knowledge, clear ideas, intellectual improvement and the search for a highest good.

English wording

Translation

R. H. M. Elwes — Translator · Latin → English

The wording shown here follows the represented English edition or translation.

Why the edition matters

Translations and editions can differ in wording, punctuation and emphasis, so the source attached to each quotation matters when exact phrasing is important.

Read the source

Open a public or archival text connected with these quotations

Use these links when you want to inspect the wording in its wider work or edition.

Represented passages

1 quotations with source context and meaning

Source identified1
the terms good and evil are only applied relatively, so that the same thing may be called both good and bad according to the relations in view,
Image design Rose Studio

“the terms good and evil are only applied relatively, so that the same thing may be called both good and bad according to the relations in view,”

Spinoza asks readers to examine evaluative terms in relation to purposes and comparisons instead of assuming that every judgment of good or bad names an absolute property.

Source details

On the Improvement of the Understanding, section 12, Project Gutenberg #1016 in R. H. M. Elwes's public-domain English translation. Spinoza says the terms good and evil are applied relatively while introducing his distinction between ordinary relative goods and the true/highest good sought by the unfinished treatise. It remains translation-mediated seventeenth-century methodological philosophy rather than a claim that all moral distinctions are meaningless.