Quote Atlassourced quotes & context
Author & topic collection

John Stuart Mill Quotes About Justice

Browse 6 quotations connecting John Stuart Mill with Justice, with meanings, source notes and related themes.

Sources

Where these justice quotations appear

Sources represented here include The Subjection of Women, On Liberty.

6 shown
Quotations

6 matching quotations with meanings and source context

Source identified1
Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.

“Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.”

Mill draws a boundary around mature individual self-government: social power requires justification when it coerces a person in matters that principally concern that person rather than preventing harm to others.

Source details

On Liberty, Chapter I, Project Gutenberg #34901. This sentence follows Mill’s harm-principle formulation and belongs to a political-philosophical argument about the legitimate limits of social and legal interference. It is not a claim that every private action has no effects or obligations toward other people.

Source identified2
If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.

“If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”

Mill makes the number of people holding an opinion irrelevant to their right to silence dissent: minority speech remains worth protecting even when nearly everyone else believes it wrong.

Source details

On Liberty, Chapter II, Project Gutenberg #34901. Mill’s next argument is epistemic as well as political: suppressing an opinion can deprive everyone of truth or of the clearer understanding created when truth is tested against error.

Source identified3
Society in equality is its normal state.

“Society in equality is its normal state.”

Mill contrasts relations organized around command and obedience with equal association, presenting equality as the normal direction of an improving society.

Source details

The Subjection of Women (1869), Chapter II, printed page 79, Project Gutenberg #27083. Mill contrasts command-and-obedience relations with equal association and states that society in equality is the normal state toward which improving social relations should move.

Source identified4
The a priori presumption is in favour of freedom and impartiality.

“The a priori presumption is in favour of freedom and impartiality.”

Mill places the burden of proof on restrictions and unequal privilege rather than treating inherited inequality as self-justifying.

Source details

The Subjection of Women (1869), Chapter I, printed page 3, Project Gutenberg #27083. Mill places the burden of proof on restrictions and unequal privilege, stating that the a priori presumption is in favour of freedom and impartiality.

Source identified5
What women by nature cannot do, it is quite superfluous to forbid them from doing.

“What women by nature cannot do, it is quite superfluous to forbid them from doing.”

The argument exposes a contradiction in claims about natural incapacity: if an activity were truly impossible by nature, legal prohibition would be unnecessary.

Source details

The Subjection of Women (1869), Chapter I, printed page 48, Project Gutenberg #27083. Mill argues that if an activity were truly contrary to women’s nature, legal or social prohibition would be superfluous; the sentence belongs to his case for free development and open competition.

Source identified6
The equality of married persons before the law, is not only the sole mode in which that particular relation can be made consistent with justice to both sides.

“The equality of married persons before the law, is not only the sole mode in which that particular relation can be made consistent with justice to both sides.”

Mill applies equal legal standing to marriage, arguing that a just relationship cannot rest on one adult possessing a superior legal status over the other.

Source details

The Subjection of Women (1869), Chapter II, printed page 78, Project Gutenberg #27083. Mill argues that equality of married persons before the law is required for justice to both sides and for marriage to become a school of moral cultivation rather than legal subordination.

More from this author

Other topic collections for John Stuart Mill