Browse 8 quotations connecting William George Jordan with Growth, with meanings, source notes and related themes.
Each quotation is included because its central idea connects with this theme, not simply because one matching word appears in the sentence.
Sources represented here include Self-Control, Its Kingship and Majesty, The Majesty of Calmness, The Power of Truth: Individual Problems and Possibilities. Keeping the work and source note beside each quotation makes differences in setting, speaker and emphasis easier to see.
Sources represented here include Self-Control, Its Kingship and Majesty, The Majesty of Calmness, The Power of Truth: Individual Problems and Possibilities.
“It is what a man makes of himself that counts.”
Jordan places developed character and chosen conduct above passive labels or circumstances when judging what a person can become.
Source note: Self-Control, Its Kingship and Majesty, “The Kingship of Self-Control.” Project Gutenberg #51469. The line belongs to late-nineteenth-century self-mastery literature and is not evidence that circumstance is irrelevant.
“Every individual is a marvel of unknown and unrealized possibilities.”
Jordan locates worth partly in capacities that have not yet been discovered or developed, resisting a final judgment based only on present performance.
Source note: Self-Control, Its Kingship and Majesty, later discussion of individual possibility. The sentence is motivational rhetoric about human potential rather than a measurable universal prediction.
“Man is placed into this world not as a finality,—but as a possibility.”
A person is described as unfinished rather than fixed, leaving room for development in conduct, ability and character.
Source note: Self-Control, Its Kingship and Majesty, opening essay. Jordan’s language is philosophical and motivational, with period assumptions about agency that should not be substituted for modern psychological evidence.
“Failure is often the turning-point, the pivot of circumstance that swings us to higher levels.”
A setback can force reassessment and redirect effort, so Jordan treats some failures as transitions rather than final verdicts.
Source note: Self-Control, Its Kingship and Majesty, essay on failure and development. “Often” matters: the source does not say every failure automatically produces improvement.
“What, to our eyes, may seem hopeless failure is often but the dawning of a greater success.”
Immediate appearances can mislead: a failure may reveal another direction or become part of later success, so present defeat need not define the whole trajectory.
Source note: The Majesty of Calmness, “Failure as a Success.” The passage is motivational interpretation, not a promise that every loss will produce a better outcome.
“The individual must look upon himself as an investment, of untold possibilities if rightly developed.”
Jordan asks the reader to regard personal capacities as worth developing rather than measuring value solely through current achievement or external recognition.
Source note: The Majesty of Calmness, “The Dignity of Self-Reliance.” The represented 1900 work is public domain; the investment metaphor belongs to Jordan’s conduct-of-life rhetoric, not financial advice.
“Let us live up to the fulness of our possibilities each day. Man has only one day of life—to-day.”
Jordan makes development immediate: today is the only day in which ability, responsibility and intention can actually be converted into conduct.
Source note: The Power of Truth, “People Who Live in Air-Castles.” The line is a present-action argument within conduct-of-life writing, not a literal denial of memory, planning or future obligations.
“If we would make our lives worthy of us, grand and noble, solid and impregnable, we must forsake air-castles of dreaming for strongholds of doing.”
Aspiration has to become action before it can shape a life; Jordan contrasts imagined achievement with concrete work toward a chosen purpose.
Source note: The Power of Truth, “People Who Live in Air-Castles.” The military imagery is metaphorical and belongs to a critique of substituting fantasy for execution.