Browse 9 quotations connecting Arthur Schopenhauer with Reading, with meanings, source notes and related themes.
Sources represented here include The Art of Literature, Essays of Schopenhauer — On Books and Reading.
“The art of not reading is highly important.”
Selecting what not to read protects limited attention from being consumed by material that is merely fashionable, noisy, or low-value.
Essay “On Books and Reading”; the surrounding passage explains selective reading rather than hostility to books generally.
“Reading is thinking with some one else's head instead of one's own.”
Reading supplies another mind’s thought, but Schopenhauer warns that consuming ideas should not replace the work of forming one’s own connected judgment.
Essay “On Books and Reading,” in a public-domain English collection of Schopenhauer’s essays.
“One can never read too little of bad, or too much of good books: bad books are intellectual poison; they destroy the mind.”
The deliberately severe contrast argues that reading quality matters because repeated exposure influences the habits and material of thought.
Essay “On Books and Reading,” public-domain English text.
“In order to read what is good one must make it a condition never to read what is bad; for life is short, and both time and strength limited.”
Finite time makes selection unavoidable, so choosing worthwhile reading also requires declining material that does not deserve limited attention.
Essay “On Books and Reading”; Schopenhauer connects literary selection directly with limited time and strength.
“it is only when he has turned it over that he can be said to know it.”
Learning becomes knowledge, in this account, when material has been actively reconsidered and integrated rather than merely encountered or memorized.
The Art of Literature, section “On Thinking for Oneself,” T. Bailey Saunders translation; Project Gutenberg #10714. The preceding sentence says a person must first learn something before turning it over in the mind.
“Good writing should be governed by the rule that a man can think only one thing clearly at a time”
Schopenhauer makes clarity of sentence structure answer to the limits of attention, arguing that prose should help the reader follow one thought distinctly instead of forcing several at once.
The Art of Literature, section “On Style,” T. Bailey Saunders translation; Project Gutenberg #10714. The following discussion criticizes overloaded parenthetical sentence construction.
“Therefore instead of contracting his words and forms of speech, let a writer enlarge his thoughts.”
Schopenhauer argues that stronger writing should come from fuller thought rather than from compressing weak ideas into mannered phrasing, tying style to intellectual substance.
The Art of Literature, section “On Style,” T. Bailey Saunders translation; Project Gutenberg #10714. The English volume rearranges material drawn from Schopenhauer’s Parerga.
“a man may have a great mass of knowledge, but if he has not worked it up by thinking it over for himself, it has much less value than a far smaller amount which he has thoroughly pondered.”
Accumulated information is distinguished from understanding: Schopenhauer values knowledge that has been actively compared, connected and reconsidered over a larger but unprocessed store.
The Art of Literature, section “On Thinking for Oneself,” T. Bailey Saunders translation; Project Gutenberg #10714. The library analogy immediately precedes the sentence.
“it is only where a man is convinced of the truth and importance of his thoughts, that he feels the enthusiasm necessary for an untiring and assiduous effort to find the clearest, finest, and strongest expression for them”
The passage connects conviction with revision effort: ideas considered important deserve sustained work toward clearer and stronger expression rather than careless presentation.
The Art of Literature, “On Style,” T. Bailey Saunders translation, Project Gutenberg #10714. Schopenhauer’s represented English essay says that conviction in the truth and importance of one’s thoughts supplies the enthusiasm for sustained work toward clearer and stronger expression. The volume rearranges Parerga material and the passage remains nineteenth-century literary counsel, not experimental writing science.
