Source identified1
“No matter what the thing is, put your conscience into it; do your best.”
Work gains moral weight when effort and conscience remain present even in tasks that seem small, routine, or unlikely to attract praise.
Source note: Character Building, “What Is To Be Our Future?”, Project Gutenberg #60484. Washington asks whether Tuskegee will remain worthy of public confidence and answers by requiring each student and worker to put conscience and full effort into every kind of work.
Source identified2
“Whatever I have done I have honestly endeavored to do to the best of my ability.”
Honesty and effort are joined in a self-assessment standard based on doing the best one can, rather than on appearance or outside praise.
Source note: Character Building, “What Is To Be Our Future?”, Project Gutenberg #60484. This sentence completes Washington’s model declaration about conscientious study and work.
Source identified3
“place yourselves in the presence of those who stand by and support this institution”
Remembering the people who support an institution becomes a test of accountability, encouraging students to connect present opportunity with obligations to a wider community.
Source note: Character Building, “Have You Done Your Best?”, Project Gutenberg #60484. The excerpt is part of Washington’s invitation to review the school year honestly.
Source identified4
“I have put my whole soul into my study, into my work, into whatever I have attempted.”
The model statement asks a student to be able to say that study and work received full engagement rather than minimal compliance.
Source note: Character Building, “What Is To Be Our Future?”, Project Gutenberg #60484. Washington offers the sentence as a standard students should be able to affirm about their own effort.
Source identified5
“we must be as reliable and as responsible as it is possible for the people of any other race to be.”
Washington makes reliability and responsibility central to the institutional and racial-uplift argument of the address, tying opportunity to dependable conduct.
Source note: Character Building, “The Importance of Being Reliable,” Project Gutenberg #60484. The race language belongs to Washington’s historical response to discriminatory judgments and employment conditions.
Source identified6
“puts his whole conscience into that work, and does it just as thoroughly as it is possible for him to do it.”
Conscience is applied to ordinary manual work, making thoroughness a matter of character even when the task is mortar-mixing or bricklaying.
Source note: Character Building, “The Virtue of Simplicity,” Project Gutenberg #60484. The sentence refers specifically to students doing building work at Tuskegee.
Source identified7
“Can we so educate a group of students that there will be in every one of them a conscience on which we can depend.”
The educational question shifts attention from acquiring information to developing dependable moral judgment, which Washington treats as a central test of character formation.
Source note: Character Building, “Each One His Part,” Project Gutenberg #60484. Washington asks whether Tuskegee can educate an individual conscience that performs small duties thoroughly even when no audience is watching; the question closes that address’s argument about conscientious responsibility.
Source identified8
“begin to-morrow morning, every boy and girl, to be reliable and to keep at it until reliability becomes a part of you.”
Reliability is treated as a habit built by repeated dependable action, not a trait someone either permanently has or lacks.
Source note: Character Building, “Keeping Your Word,” Project Gutenberg #60484. Washington directs the advice to Tuskegee students in the context of promptness and keeping commitments.
Source identified9
“unless all this training of head and hand is based upon high, upright character, upon a true heart, it will amount to nothing.”
Knowledge and practical skill are not sufficient in Washington’s educational ideal unless they are joined to the character with which those abilities are used.
Source note: Character Building, “What Would Father and Mother Say?”, Project Gutenberg #60484. This is Washington’s normative theory of education and character, not a modern educational outcome study.
Source identified10
“It does not pay an individual to do anything except what his conscience will approve of every day, and every hour and minute in the day.”
Washington makes conscience a recurring test of conduct, asking whether ordinary choices can withstand one’s own moral approval rather than merely outside scrutiny.
Source note: Character Building, “What Will Pay?”, Project Gutenberg #60484. Washington reports a discussion of honesty in business and uses conscience as a practical test of conduct; the sentence belongs to that address’s argument that dishonest dealing does not pay.
Source identified11
“each morning will find you in the recitation rooms with your lessons more thoroughly and more conscientiously prepared for the day’s work than they were for the work of the day before.”
Daily preparation is used as a measurable form of growth: each day’s work should become more thorough and conscientious than the last.
Source note: Character Building, “Growth,” Project Gutenberg #60484. Washington is speaking specifically about students preparing lessons and cultivating disciplined study habits.
Source identified12
“Have you been really honest with your parents, who have struggled, who have sacrificed, who have toiled for years, in ways you do not know of, in order that you might come here, and in order that you might remain here?”
Washington asks students to measure their own effort against sacrifices made by parents, making gratitude inseparable from honest responsibility for the opportunity received.
Source note: Character Building, “Have You Done Your Best?”, Project Gutenberg #60484. The question is addressed to Tuskegee students reflecting on family sacrifice and their school work.
Source identified13
“stand by principle at all hazards.”
Washington distinguishes tactical cooperation from questions of right and wrong, where he advises maintaining principle despite possible cost.
Source note: The Future of the American Negro, Chapter VIII; Project Gutenberg #26507. This short excerpt appears in Washington’s closing policy discussion, where he distinguishes ordinary political cooperation from cases involving a question of right or wrong and advises standing by principle in those cases.
Source identified14
“I would permit no man, no matter what his colour might be, to narrow and degrade my soul by making me hate him.”
Washington frames refusal to hate as protection of his own moral agency: another person’s prejudice or wrongdoing should not be allowed to dictate the emotional character of his inner life.
Source note: Up from Slavery, Chapter XI, “Making Their Beds Before They Could Lie On Them,” Project Gutenberg #2376. Washington says he learned from General Armstrong to reject racial hatred and applies that lesson specifically to hostility and wrongs inflicted on Black Americans; the historical context remains explicit rather than becoming generic advice to ignore mistreatment.