Source identified1
“in literary as in all other art, structure is all-important”
Pater treats structure as a governing discipline: a work should be conceived as a whole whose parts remain related to its beginning, direction and intended end.
Source note: Appreciations, essay “Style”; Project Gutenberg #4037. The surrounding sentence develops the metaphor of an architectural conception of a literary work.
Source identified2
“makes the reading of Wordsworth an excellent sort of training towards the things of art and poetry.”
Pater presents sustained engagement with a difficult poet as a form of aesthetic training, implying that taste and discrimination can be developed through repeated attentive reading.
Source note: Appreciations, essay on Wordsworth; Project Gutenberg #4037. The sentence refers specifically to the contrast Pater perceives between higher and lower qualities in Wordsworth’s poetry.
Source identified3
“a habit of reading between the lines, a faith in the effect of concentration and collectedness of mind in the right appreciation of poetry”
Pater describes demanding reading as training in concentration and inference, where appreciation grows through disciplined attention instead of quick surface consumption.
Source note: Appreciations, essay on Wordsworth; Project Gutenberg #4037. Pater is describing the kind of training he believes Wordsworth can produce in receptive readers.
Source identified4
“all progress of mind consists for the most part in differentiation, in the resolution of an obscure and complex object into its component aspects”
Pater describes intellectual progress as learning to distinguish parts within what initially seems confused, a method that makes clearer categories and more exact judgment possible.
Source note: Appreciations, essay “Style”; Project Gutenberg #4037. The immediate example concerns distinctions between prose, verse and poetry.
Source identified5
“He will remember always that beauty exists in many forms.”
The sentence resists a single narrow standard of beauty and asks the critic to remain open to excellence appearing through different periods, types and schools.
Source note: The Renaissance, Preface; Project Gutenberg #2398. The following sentences extend the point across periods and schools of taste.
Source identified6
“To define beauty, not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible”
Pater begins aesthetic criticism by preferring close attention to particular works and experiences over a universal formula, making discrimination and concrete observation central to judgment.
Source note: The Renaissance, Preface; Project Gutenberg #2398, represented sixth-edition text. The phrase introduces Pater’s method of aesthetic criticism.
Source identified7
“To burn always with this hard, gemlike flame, to maintain this ecstasy, is success in life.”
The famous image defines success through intensity and alertness of experience rather than conventional achievement, fitting Pater’s larger argument against living automatically through habit.
Source note: The Renaissance, Conclusion; Project Gutenberg #2398. The metaphor belongs to Pater’s aesthetic philosophy and should not be reduced to generic productivity advice.
Source identified8
“Our education becomes complete in proportion as our susceptibility to these impressions increases in depth and variety.”
Pater describes education as an increasing capacity to notice and distinguish varied impressions, so development involves deepening responsiveness rather than merely accumulating information.
Source note: The Renaissance, Preface; Project Gutenberg #2398. “These impressions” refers to responses produced by art, landscape, personality and other aesthetic objects.
Source identified9
“The service of philosophy, of speculative culture, towards the human spirit is to rouse, to startle it into sharp and eager observation.”
Pater values philosophy for sharpening attention: its practical intellectual service is to make perception more alert rather than allowing experience to pass unnoticed through habit.
Source note: The Renaissance, Conclusion; Project Gutenberg #2398. The line belongs to Pater’s historically controversial conclusion on experience and culture.
Source identified10
“What we have to do is to be for ever curiously testing new opinions and courting new impressions, never acquiescing in a facile orthodoxy”
Pater recommends intellectual openness and repeated testing rather than easy conformity, making revision and exposure to new impressions part of an active critical life.
Source note: The Renaissance, Conclusion; Project Gutenberg #2398. The sentence names Comte, Hegel and one’s own orthodoxy in its immediate continuation.
Source identified11
“the first step towards seeing one's object as it really is, is to know one's own impression as it really is, to discriminate it, to realise it distinctly.”
Critical judgment begins with accurately noticing one’s own response before turning that response into a claim about the work, making self-observation part of disciplined interpretation.
Source note: The Renaissance, Preface; Project Gutenberg #2398. Pater is describing aesthetic criticism, not claiming that personal impression alone settles every factual question.