Source identified
“What am I? A part of the infinite.”
Tolstoy frames the self as finite yet participating in something larger, shifting the question of meaning away from isolated individual duration toward a relation with the infinite.
Source note: My Confession, Leo Wiener translation; the question appears in Tolstoy’s investigation of how finite human life might be related to an infinite reality.
Source identified
“The motor power of his life is love.”
Within Tolstoy’s three-part account of life, the divine conception is motivated by love rather than personal enjoyment or social glory.
Source note: The Kingdom of God Is Within You, Chapter IV; Constance Garnett translation, Project Gutenberg #43302. In Tolstoy’s threefold account of animal, social and divine conceptions of life, the divine conception is governed by love and directed toward God rather than personal enjoyment or social glory.
Source identified
“There is no Wealth but Life.”
Ruskin makes human life and its capacities the final measure of wealth, challenging definitions that treat accumulated money or goods as sufficient evidence of national well-being.
Source note: Unto This Last, fourth essay, first published in Cornhill Magazine in 1860 and collected in book form in 1862; Project Gutenberg #36541. This is Ruskin’s normative political-economy argument, not a modern empirical wealth metric.
Source identified
“All things, then, seek the good.”
Boethius frames action as movement toward some perceived good, making the nature of genuine goodness central to understanding desire, purpose, and happiness.
Source note: The Consolation of Philosophy, Book III; H. R. James translation, during the argument that beings pursue preservation, unity, happiness, and ultimately the good.
Source identified
“life is the end and aim of consumption.”
Consumption is judged by what it ultimately does for human life, making economic activity a means rather than an end in itself within Ruskin’s argument.
Source note: Unto This Last, fourth essay; Project Gutenberg #36541. The line follows Ruskin’s distinction between production and consumption and retains the nineteenth-century political-economy setting.
Source identified
“The true life is the life which adds something”
In Tolstoy’s Christian interpretation, meaningful life contributes to a human inheritance received from earlier generations and passed forward to others.
Source note: My Religion, Chapter VIII; Huntington Smith translation, represented 1885 Crowell edition, Project Gutenberg #43794. In Tolstoy’s contrast between isolated personal life and the “true life,” the passage treats inherited human labour and obligation across generations within his Christian argument, not as a secular universal claim.