Browse 7 quotations connecting Plato with Truth, with meanings, source notes and related themes.
The Republic explores how images, opinions and education can differ from what is real; the Apology shows Socrates questioning a confident reputation for wisdom; and Theaetetus tests whether even a correct judgment amounts to knowledge. In the separately composed Phaedo (around 91b–c), Socrates addresses Simmias and Cebes during an unresolved argument about the soul. He explicitly invites them to challenge him if his reasoning is wrong, putting truth ahead of loyalty to his person. These four distinct dialogues are not four independent translations of one work. The passages represent different argumentative settings, and Socrates is a character speaking in Plato’s text, not a direct autobiographical statement by Plato. The English phrasing belongs to Jowett’s translation; theological claims about the soul are historical philosophy, not established scientific fact.
Sources represented here include Apology, Phaedo, The Republic.
“I shall obey God rather than you.”
Socrates presents moral and philosophical duty as more binding than compliance with pressure from political authority.
Apology, Jowett translation; Socrates says he would continue practicing philosophy even if acquittal were conditioned on silence.
“I neither know nor think that I know.”
Socrates locates a small advantage in recognizing the boundary of his own knowledge: uncertainty is intellectually healthier than possessing the same ignorance while mistaking it for wisdom.
Plato, Apology, Benjamin Jowett translation, Project Gutenberg #1656. Socrates says this after examining a politician whom others considered wise; the wording is dialogue speech attributed to Socrates within Plato’s work, not a claim that Socrates knew literally nothing.
“The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Socrates links a worthwhile human life with reflection on beliefs, conduct, and reasons rather than unexamined routine.
Apology 38a; wording varies by translation.
“I would rather die having spoken after my manner, than speak in your manner and live.”
Preserving truthful speech and character is valued above survival purchased by abandoning one’s principles merely to satisfy an audience.
Apology, Jowett translation; Socrates rejects saving himself through a style of pleading he considers unworthy.
“And I would ask you to be thinking of the truth and not of Socrates: agree with me, if I seem to you to be speaking the truth; or if not, withstand me might and main, that I may not deceive you as well as myself in my enthusiasm, and like the bee, leave my sting in you before I die.”
Facing death, Socrates asks his friends to challenge the argument he is defending if they find it mistaken. His emphasis is on testing whether a claim is true rather than accepting it because of the speaker’s reputation, even when that speaker is himself. The appeal belongs to a debate, not a universal guarantee that his view of the soul is correct.
Phaedo, approximately Stephanus 91b–c, Socrates speaking to Simmias and Cebes after their objections to the arguments about the soul’s survival. He specifically asks them to contradict him if they think his reasoning is wrong. This is a complete sentence from Benjamin Jowett’s English translation, Project Gutenberg #1658, in the dialogue after the translator’s separate introduction. Socrates is a character and local speaker; do not attribute the sentence as a direct personal remark by Plato.
“Opinion appears to you to be darker than knowledge, but lighter than ignorance?”
Opinion is treated as an intermediate state: it is not complete ignorance, but it also lacks the clarity and stability of knowledge.
The Republic, Book V; Socrates places opinion between knowledge and ignorance in the argument about what each apprehends.
“And yet, O my friend, if true opinion in law courts and knowledge are the same, the perfect judge could not have judged rightly without knowledge; and therefore I must infer that they are not the same.”
Socrates argues that someone can arrive at a correct judgment on testimony without having witnessed or known the event firsthand. The example tests Theaetetus’s proposal that knowledge simply equals true opinion; the dialogue continues to investigate other proposed definitions rather than announcing a simple final formula.
Theaetetus, around Stephanus 201a–c, Socrates explaining his law-court counterexample while speaking with Theaetetus. Benjamin Jowett English translation, Project Gutenberg #1726. The full sentence is spoken by Socrates in the dramatic dialogue, not from Jowett’s prefatory commentary; no claim is made about modern evidence law.
